Skip Navigation

IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics, Communications and Computer Sciences 2006 E89-A(2):575-582; doi:10.1093/ietfec/e89-a.2.575
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by TAGA, N.
Right arrow Articles by MASE, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © 2006 The Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers

Regular Section -- Papers -- Information Theory

On the Convergence of Loopy Belief Propagation Algorithm for Different Update Rules

Nobuyuki TAGA1 and Shigeru MASE1

1 The authors are with Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, 152-8552 Japan. E-mail: Nobuyuki.Taga{at}is.titech.ac.jp, E-mail: mase{at}is.titech.ac.jp

The belief propagation (BP) algorithm is a tool with which one can calculate beliefs, marginal probabilities, of probabilistic networks without loops (e.g., Bayesian networks) in a time proportional to the number of nodes. For networks with loops, it may not converge and, even if it converges, beliefs may not be equal to exact marginal probabilities although its application is known to give remarkably good results such as in the coding theory. Tatikonda and Jordan show a theoretical result on the convergence of the algorithm for probabilistic networks with loops in terms of the theory of Markov random fields on trees and give a sufficient condition of the convergence of the algorithm. In this paper, we discuss the "impatient" update rule as well as the "lazy" update rule discussed in Tatikonda and Jordan. In the viewpoint of the theory of Markov random fields, it is shown that the rule for updating both gives essentially the same results and the impatient update rule is expected to converge faster than the lazy one. Numerical experiments are also given.

Key Words: belief propagation algorithm, Markov random field, unwrapped network, phase transition


Manuscript received January 12, 2005. Manuscript revised June 18, 2005. Final manuscript received October 18, 2005.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.